tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post2115411149122900240..comments2024-03-27T00:34:03.894-07:00Comments on Carl Backstrom's Blog: New Stuff (1)Carl Backstromhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05017816632779478810noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post-39353813916847215582013-07-22T23:53:13.730-07:002013-07-22T23:53:13.730-07:00Good share of this post. Thanks.
www.kellyhandbag...Good share of this post. Thanks. <br /><a href="http://www.kellyhandbag.com" rel="nofollow">www.kellyhandbag.com</a><br />Ideation Fashionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05747709881385879688noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post-41002991946202594382013-05-08T08:16:17.493-07:002013-05-08T08:16:17.493-07:00I miss Carl... :(I miss Carl... :(thargenediadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04346059385499433721noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post-37002898436868878332012-09-01T14:16:24.760-07:002012-09-01T14:16:24.760-07:00I really enjoy reading the post, thanks for sharin...I really enjoy reading the post, thanks for sharing I really like it, I already bookmarked it, thank you guys.<br />pay per head call centerhttp://www.9dollarperhead.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post-44646222183598054192010-08-30T02:26:35.005-07:002010-08-30T02:26:35.005-07:00Hi guys. I used this example in my project. But I ...Hi guys. I used this example in my project. But I have one problem with umlauts.<br />If I am using example on your side, then works excellent. In my project all umlauts returned by proccess have different characters.<br />For example: I am using string with "München" and process returned just "Munchen". Please ask me what is problem?<br />PS. I am trying to use next code in the proccess on-demand:<br />...<br />owa_util.mime_header('text/html', false);<br />htp.p('Content-Length: '||length(l_value));<br />htp.p('Content-Language: de');<br />owa_util.http_header_close;<br />... <br />but it's not work.<br />ThanksBronknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post-45156555154576492092009-12-24T07:10:26.982-08:002009-12-24T07:10:26.982-08:00In reaction to Anonymous:
Why we need a temp item?...In reaction to Anonymous:<br />Why we need a temp item?<br />I don't know how these temp items work, but the only reason that makes sense to me, is that they enable you to define variables and assign a value to them, no matter what the current page.<br />In other words: you set the value on page 11, after which the same value is avaible in any page the user navigates to - until you assign it a different value somewhere along the line.<br /><br />Can someone please confirm this?<br />RemcoRemco Gorisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post-85883688368260013632008-09-17T02:28:00.000-07:002008-09-17T02:28:00.000-07:00Hi Patrick, great work.Which difference between ht...Hi Patrick, great work.<BR/><BR/>Which difference between htp.p and htp.prn into on demand process?<BR/><BR/>Thanks,<BR/>SergioAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post-16045209752033979712008-04-07T07:41:00.000-07:002008-04-07T07:41:00.000-07:00There's something I don't get. Why do you need a t...There's something I don't get. <BR/>Why do you need a temp item at all?<BR/><BR/>try<BR/><BR/>on the js:<BR/>get.addParam('P11_TEST',$v('P11_TEST')); <BR/><BR/>on the pl/sql:<BR/>l_value := v('P11_TEST');<BR/><BR/>it works fine for me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post-2911976900284755032008-03-28T17:06:00.000-07:002008-03-28T17:06:00.000-07:00Hello CarlI have a few questions if you don't mind...Hello Carl<BR/><BR/>I have a few questions if you don't mind.<BR/><BR/>Is it possible to post x01..x10 global variables with add() method ?<BR/><BR/>What is the difference between add() and addParam() ( or perhaps I should ask why didn't you use add() for x01..x10 ?<BR/><BR/>Can I set those global variable's values like common items in PL/SQL:<BR/>APEX_UTIL.SET_SESSION_STATE(wwv_flow.g_x01,null);<BR/>... or is there any more concise way to do it ?<BR/><BR/><BR/>Kind Regards,<BR/>MatjazAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post-3796227364383872008-03-22T11:27:00.000-07:002008-03-22T11:27:00.000-07:00Hi Arie,they are not related. The x01-x20 paramete...Hi Arie,<BR/><BR/>they are not related. The x01-x20 parameters for accept have always been there. They are used for example by the report pagination select list. I don't know why this is been done, because pagination never issues a submit, it just redirects. The select list could just skip the name property to tell the browser that the field doesn't have to be submitted...<BR/><BR/>PatrickPatrick Wolfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16652802762749621200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post-12707666889023890082008-03-22T09:59:00.000-07:002008-03-22T09:59:00.000-07:00Hi Carl,First, I didn’t want to hijack Joel’s blog...Hi Carl,<BR/><BR/>First, I didn’t want to hijack Joel’s blog, so thanks on the update about Vikas. I guess when he has you on his IM “speed dial” he can visit the forum less frequently :-) <BR/><BR/>And to the current post. I’ve seen that the WWV_FLOW package has G_X01 to G_X10 global variables, and the ACCEPT procedure has x01 to x20 as parameters. Is there any connection between these? <BR/><BR/>Thanks,<BR/>Arie.Arie Gellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07065126195116682377noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post-7844179631540466292008-03-22T09:19:00.000-07:002008-03-22T09:19:00.000-07:00In my opinion application items where overused in ...In my opinion application items where overused in the past, because most time a page item could also have been used for passing the value. But the new parameters are nice, especially if you really write generic on-demand processes like for the upcoming custom item types.<BR/><BR/>A small code improvement, you should replace page 0 in the htmldb_Get call with $v('pFlowStepId'), see <A HREF="http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1710655&group_id=184339&atid=908860" REL="nofollow"> AJAX and page 0 problem</A> for the reason.<BR/><BR/>BTW, why is it not possible to define an on-demand process on page level? Most of this processes are page specific, having them all on application level makes it quite hard to track them. Especially if we add more and more AJAX stuff into our applications.<BR/><BR/>Greetings<BR/>PatrickPatrick Wolfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16652802762749621200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post-63948270517383938542008-03-21T21:14:00.000-07:002008-03-21T21:14:00.000-07:00It sounds like such a little thing, but this was a...It sounds like such a little thing, but this was always something that used to really annoy me.<BR/><BR/>I really like the direction Apex is going. Interactive reports has made a big difference on the querying side of things. Can't wait until release 4.0 comes out with user-defined widgets.Mark Lancasterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06316329564169609358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post-14955793881446499882008-03-21T14:29:00.000-07:002008-03-21T14:29:00.000-07:00Great job, sometimes the small changes can go a lo...Great job, sometimes the small changes can go a long way.Dan McGhanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13971112000913341546noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26115924.post-3648543808261997822008-03-21T06:43:00.000-07:002008-03-21T06:43:00.000-07:00This is EXTREMELY nice. Now we don't have to have ...This is EXTREMELY nice. Now we don't have to have all those application items hanging around for no other purpose than to serve and AJAX call. GREAT WORK.<BR/><BR/>Now if there were only a way to better debug what is going on in the application process... <BR/><BR/>:)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com